🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsOff-TopicBest kitchen gadgets for high-protein cooking — anyone have experience? Page 2

Best kitchen gadgets for high-protein cooking — anyone have experience?

sarah.morrison Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 6:41 PM 13 replies 2,215 viewsPage 2 of 3
wendy_avl
Member
245
1,123
Oct 2024
Asheville, NC
Mar 7, 2024 at 9:55 PM#6
sarah.morrison said:
Distribution matters less than total but it is not nothing.

DEXA scan update relevant to protein intake:

Scanned at months 0, 6, and 12. Here are the body comp numbers:

BaselineMonth 6Month 12
Total mass273 lbs223 lbs210 lbs
Fat mass113 lbs73 lbs45 lbs
Lean mass151 lbs144 lbs157 lbs
Body fat %42%30%24%

Lean mass preserved — actually GAINED 1-2 lbs thanks to progressive overload + 1.4g/kg protein. The protein intake discussion needs to include body comp data, not just scale weight.

45 15SleepFixSam, PurityPaulOR, MaxMetOK and 42 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
sophie_paris
Member
212
890
Nov 2024
Paris, FR
Mar 7, 2024 at 11:11 PM#7

Following on from PharmD_Rodriguez — and this may be the naive question:

Whether the RDA is the wrong reference entirely during rapid weight loss, and what the actual target should be?

Last edited: Mar 8, 2024 at 4:11 AM
44 14CryptoCarl, MariaRD, AussieAnna and 41 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
PharmHunterJen
Member
567
2,345
Jul 2024
Illinois
Mar 8, 2024 at 12:27 AM#8
wendy_avl said:
DEXA scan update relevant to protein intake: Scanned at months 0, 6, and 12.

Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. The useful move here is to separate what is established from what is widely repeated. Those two sets overlap less than the confident tone of most write-ups suggests, and the second set is where nearly all the disagreement on this board comes from.

43 13kevin_tulsa, Dr.PainCLE, mike_mealprep and 40 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
sarah.morrison
VIP Member
3,212
14,567
Jan 2024
California
Online
Mar 8, 2024 at 1:43 AM#9

OP back with an update, since a thread like this is useless without one.

Reporting back — setting the target on reference weight rather than current weight turned an impossible number into a boring one.

Last edited: Mar 8, 2024 at 2:43 AM
42 12Dr.NephBHM_UK, kim_atl_prep, sarah_TO and 39 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
DanielChem_CHI
Senior Member
1,234
5,678
Mar 2024
Chicago, IL
Mar 8, 2024 at 7:47 AM#10
PharmHunterJen said:
The useful move here is to separate what is established from what is widely repeated.

Agreed on the target, with the caveat that reference weight and current weight are different numbers. Using current weight at the start of a large loss produces a target that is both unachievable and unnecessary.

Happy to go further on any of that.

26 24nick_SD_fit, ben_calgary, patPC_UT and 23 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

What are you cooking tonight? (High protein edition)9 replies
Fitness tracker recommendations — beyond step counting10 replies
Books that changed your relationship with food17 replies
Air fryer recipes thread — quick high-protein meals23 replies
What does your shot day routine look like?6 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register