A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:
What would you measure differently if you were starting again?
A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:
What would you measure differently if you were starting again?
EndoResFellow said:Update — I was wrong in the opening post, specifically about the direction.
I am going to disagree with the direction of travel here. The thread has converged on the tidiest answer rather than the best-supported one, and those are not the same thing.
EndoResFellow said:Update — I was wrong in the opening post, specifically about the direction.
True, and it depends on a baseline nobody has stated. Without knowing where someone started, the same number can be an excellent result or a disappointing one.
Ask again with the specifics and you will get a better answer than this one.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsEndoResFellow said:Update — I was wrong in the opening post, specifically about the direction.
Saving this. It is the first explanation that did not require me to already understand it. Sending this to two other people who asked me the same thing last week.
Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any. If nothing would, the discussion is not about evidence, and it is better to say so early than to spend nine posts discovering it.