Dr.EndoEP said:Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it.
No disagreement, though it depends on where somebody is starting from, and this thread has been assuming a starting point nobody stated.
adam_van said:True, and anyone with reduced kidney function needs that target set by a clinician rather than a forum.
Thank you for spelling out the reasoning rather than just the conclusion. Adding it to my notes with a link back to this thread.
Dr.EndoEP said:Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it.
Filing a mild objection. Mild because I might be wrong; an objection because nobody has addressed the case that does not fit. Pushing back on the anecdote-stacking. Twenty people reporting the same thing is twenty samples from the same self-selected pool, not twenty independent confirmations.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsOne concrete data point for the thread. Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath. An edited-away mistake is invisible to the next person who makes it.
Moderator note: good thread. Keeping it here rather than moving it, because the question is general enough to be useful.