Oct 29, 2024 at 10:50 AM#31
A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:
Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?
46 21denise_HTX, raj_cambridge, ingrid_STO and 43 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Nov 6, 2024 at 12:29 AM#32
Dr.NutriCornell said:Nothing dramatic to report, which is the report.
I read this differently from Dr.NutriCornell, on substance rather than tone. I would resist the confidence. Half of what this board was certain about two years ago has since been quietly dropped, and nobody went back to correct the threads.
45 20Dr.MetabolicMD, RetaRick_CA, JenPlateau and 42 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Nov 13, 2024 at 2:12 PM#33
Dr.NutriCornell said:Nothing dramatic to report, which is the report.
True, and it depends on a baseline nobody has stated. Without knowing where someone started, the same number can be an excellent result or a disappointing one.
Last edited: Nov 13, 2024 at 8:12 PM
44 19TomFromTexas, mike.trainer_LA, sarah_nash92 and 41 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsNov 28, 2024 at 5:51 PM#35
From the other side of the consultation, briefly. Whatever the answer turns out to be, the method for getting there is the same: state the assumption, do the arithmetic in public, and invite the correction. That is slower than asserting, and it is the only version that survives being wrong.
42 17robert_kc, dan_philly, MeganSA_TX and 39 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report