andrew_nyc said:It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any.
Second this.
andrew_nyc said:It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any.
Second this.
andrew_nyc said:It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any.
There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked. Narrow it and it becomes tractable; leave it broad and the thread will produce nine confident and incompatible replies.
One concrete data point for the thread. One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it. Reconstructing a timeline from memory three months later is how people end up unable to answer the one question that would have resolved it.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsFollowing on from andrew_nyc — and this may be the naive question:
What would you measure differently if you were starting again?
OP back with an update, since a thread like this is useless without one.
Closing the loop. The answer turned out to depend on the detail I had left out of the opening post, which is a lesson about how to ask rather than about the subject.