Post-prandial glucose control — looking for input

Dr.RenalNash said:

The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person.

There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it. The narrow version usually has an answer; the broad version usually does not, and answering the broad one is how a thread stops being useful.

If somebody has the primary source to hand I would rather cite it than paraphrase it.

One concrete data point for the thread. If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself. Four weeks is the usual minimum for anything pharmacological on this board, and two weeks of data has told you almost nothing.

One thing that is still open after Dr.RenalNash’s answer:

What did you change at the same time, and can you separate the two now?

Dr.PathRoch said:

If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself.

Careful with the causal language. Two things moving together in a period when five things changed is not a mechanism, and stating it as one makes the thread less useful to somebody reading it later.

Dr.PathRoch said:

If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself.

Correct as far as it goes. The part it does not cover is what to do when the honest answer is "not enough data", which is more often than anyone likes.