Best kitchen gadgets for high-protein cooking — what worked for you?

NicoleRaleigh said:

One habit that pays for itself: post the method alongside the number.

Saving this. It is the first explanation that did not require me to already understand it. Adding it to my notes with a link back to this thread.

Reporting back.

Reporting back — setting the target on reference weight rather than current weight turned an impossible number into a boring one.

tom_AK said:

Reporting back — setting the target on reference weight rather than current weight turned an impossible number into a boring one.

Mine went the same way, slower.

tom_AK said:

Reporting back — setting the target on reference weight rather than current weight turned an impossible number into a boring one.

Coming at tom_AK’s question from a different direction. Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion. Almost every disagreement here turns out to be two people measuring different things and comparing the numbers anyway.

One concrete data point for the thread. Give anything pharmacological four weeks before you judge it, and give anything measured weekly a four-point rolling average before you call it a trend.