Following on from LibrarianMeg — and this may be the naive question:
What did you change at the same time, and can you separate the two now?
bri_stats said:The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person.
I read this differently from bri_stats, on substance rather than tone. I would resist the confidence. Half of what this board was certain about two years ago has since been quietly dropped, and nobody went back to correct the threads.
bri_stats said:The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person.
Agreed on the substance. I would put less weight on the timescale, because two months of anything is not enough to distinguish a trend from a wobble.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View Resultsbri_stats said:The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person.
Genuinely useful, thank you. I had the facts and not the framework.
Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked. Narrow it and it becomes tractable; leave it broad and the thread will produce nine confident and incompatible replies.