A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:
What would you measure differently if you were starting again?
A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:
What would you measure differently if you were starting again?
dave_SLC said:Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason.
Pushing back on dave_SLC here. The counter-case has not been addressed. Somebody upthread described the situation that does not fit, and the thread moved on rather than engaging with it, which is the failure mode this board is supposed to avoid.
dave_SLC said:Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason.
Fair, and it stops being fair at the extremes. The middle of the range is well understood; the ends are where the honest answer is that nobody knows.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference Standardsdave_SLC said:Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason.
Saving this. It is the first explanation that did not require me to already understand it. Adding it to my notes with a link back to this thread.
From the other side of the consultation, briefly. There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.
I would rather be corrected than agreed with, if it comes to it.