VanRx_Mike said:The honest answer is that the effect is real, the magnitude is contested, and the individual variation is larger than either.
This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth. The detail I would add is minor and it is already implied above.
VanRx_Mike said:The honest answer is that the effect is real, the magnitude is contested, and the individual variation is larger than either.
Coming at VanRx_Mike’s question from a different direction. Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it. The narrow version usually has an answer; the broad version usually does not, and answering the broad one is how a thread stops being useful.
The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath. An edited-away mistake is invisible to the next person who makes it.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemFollowing on from VanRx_Mike — and this may be the naive question:
What did you change at the same time, and can you separate the two now?
PharmacoVig_BOS said:Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.
Pushing back on PharmacoVig_BOS here. Filing an objection on the n=1 problem. Personal experience is genuine evidence about one person and very weak evidence about anybody else, and this thread keeps promoting the first into the second.