The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. The boring version of this is the one that works, and the boring version is: measure a baseline, change one variable, wait, measure again under the same conditions. Nobody wants that answer and it is still the answer.
Jun 15, 2024 at 1:46 AM#31
Last edited: Jun 15, 2024 at 2:46 AM
1 24VendorMark
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Jun 17, 2024 at 8:25 AM#33
DataDave said:The boring version of this is the one that works, and the boring version is: measure a baseline, change one variable, wait, measure again under the…
This is where I part company with the consensus forming above. I think the framing smuggles in the conclusion. Ask it the other way round and the obvious answer reverses, which usually means the question is doing the work.
Last edited: Jun 17, 2024 at 1:25 PM
3 1Dr.ReproEndo, lucas_SP_BR, lisa_labSD
Reply Quote Save Share Report
PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsJun 18, 2024 at 11:44 AM#34
DataDave said:The boring version of this is the one that works, and the boring version is: measure a baseline, change one variable, wait, measure again under the…
Agreed, with the usual condition: that holds for the average and this board is a collection of individuals. A population claim and a personal prediction are different things and get quoted interchangeably.
Last edited: Jun 18, 2024 at 1:44 PM
4 2TomFromTexas, mike.trainer_LA, sarah_nash92 and 1 other
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Jun 19, 2024 at 3:02 PM#35
DataDave said:The boring version of this is the one that works, and the boring version is: measure a baseline, change one variable, wait, measure again under the…
Genuinely useful, thank you. I had the facts and not the framework. Sending this to two other people who asked me the same thing last week.
5 3JennaRN, LabKate, kate.chem and 2 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report