Dr.BariatricHTX said:Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it.
Right, and the exception is worth naming rather than left implied, because the exception is where people get into trouble.
stefan_berlin said:Agreed on the target, with the caveat that reference weight and current weight are different numbers.
Thank you for spelling out the reasoning rather than just the conclusion.
Dr.BariatricHTX said:Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it.
This is where I part company with the consensus forming above. I would resist the confidence. Half of what this board was certain about two years ago has since been quietly dropped, and nobody went back to correct the threads.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsAdding the numbers, since they settle part of this. Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath. An edited-away mistake is invisible to the next person who makes it.
Moderator note: the sourcing question belongs in the vendor section and has been split out. Tagging this one for the weekly digest.