DerekSJ_a1c said:Right, and the exception is worth naming rather than left implied, because the exception is where people get into trouble.
This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth. Nothing to add that would improve it.
DerekSJ_a1c said:Right, and the exception is worth naming rather than left implied, because the exception is where people get into trouble.
There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. Take it one variable at a time. Almost every unanswerable question in these threads is unanswerable because three things changed in the same fortnight, and no amount of subsequent argument can untangle them after the fact.
Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here. A large fraction of the apparent disagreement in these threads is two people using different units and both being right.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsA narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:
Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?
josh_phd_bmore said:Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here.
I read this differently from josh_phd_bmore, on substance rather than tone. Not convinced. The evidence being cited is consistent with the conclusion and also consistent with two other conclusions nobody has ruled out.