LibrarianMeg said:It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.
Same experience, arrived at from the opposite direction. Posting only so the count is not one.
LibrarianMeg said:It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.
Same experience, arrived at from the opposite direction. Posting only so the count is not one.
Dr.GutHealth said:If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way.
Can confirm. Same sequence, different timescale. The detail I would add is minor and it is already implied above.
Dr.GutHealth said:If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way.
Coming at Dr.GutHealth’s question from a different direction. The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked. Narrow it and it becomes tractable; leave it broad and the thread will produce nine confident and incompatible replies.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsAdding the numbers, since they settle part of this. Give anything pharmacological four weeks before you judge it, and give anything measured weekly a four-point rolling average before you call it a trend.