TinaHashiRN said:The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions.
True, with the qualification that this is a self-selected group. The people for whom it did not work post less, and that shapes everything we think we know.
KarenAZ_mom said:Agreed, with a caveat about community reputation: it is a lagging indicator.
This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else. Printing the relevant bit and taking it with me.
TinaHashiRN said:The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions.
I read this differently. The confidence in this thread is running ahead of the evidence, and I would rather the uncertainty were stated than smoothed over because it is unsatisfying.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsAdding the numbers, since they settle part of this. One habit that pays for itself: post the method alongside the number. A figure without its method cannot be checked, and an unchecked figure is how this community accumulates folklore.
Moderator note: good thread. Keeping it here rather than moving it, because the question is general enough to be useful. No action needed from anybody.