🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsBuyer Beware⚠ 50+ FDA warning letters sent to peptide vendors in 2025 — need advice Page 4

⚠ 50+ FDA warning letters sent to peptide vendors in 2025 — need advice

MarkLI_maint Fri, May 3, 2024 at 2:07 AM 16 replies 2,234 viewsPage 4 of 4
roxy_nash
Member
178
890
Dec 2024
Nashville, TN
May 10, 2024 at 5:47 AM#16

From the other side of the consultation, briefly. The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked. Narrow it and it becomes tractable; leave it broad and the thread will produce nine confident and incompatible replies.

12 10josh_phd_bmore, roxy_nash, tony_orlando and 9 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Admin
Administrator
2,456
9,812
Oct 2023
Online
May 11, 2024 at 7:33 AM#17
roxy_nash said:
The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.

I read this differently from roxy_nash, on substance rather than tone. Pushing back on the consensus forming here. Consistency is not the same as correctness, and a board that agrees with itself quickly is usually agreeing with the first person who sounded certain.

Correct me if the detail matters more than I have assumed.

Last edited: May 11, 2024 at 11:33 AM
13 11SleepDoc_PDX, RegAffairsDC, BiostatsBrad and 10 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
ZaraB_AL
Member
456
1,678
Jan 2025
Alabama
May 12, 2024 at 9:19 AM#18
roxy_nash said:
The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.

No disagreement, though it depends on where somebody is starting from, and this thread has been assuming a starting point nobody stated.

Last edited: May 12, 2024 at 10:19 AM
14 12TirzTom, TrialTracker_MD, JennaRN and 11 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
JessicaM_2024
Member
823
3,456
Mar 2024
Portland, OR
May 13, 2024 at 11:06 AM#19
roxy_nash said:
The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.

This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else. Sending this to two other people who asked me the same thing last week.

15 13Dr.PainCLE, mike_mealprep, NicoleRaleigh and 12 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
VendorMark
Senior Member
3,456
14,567
Jan 2024
Texas
Online
May 14, 2024 at 12:53 PM#20

Moderator note: a couple of off-topic posts removed.

Last edited: May 14, 2024 at 2:53 PM
37 10claudia_zurich, nancy_portland, rick_sfbay and 34 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

⚠ Peptide Sciences SHUT DOWN March 6, 2026 — what happened and what to do now8 replies
⚠ Amino Asylum raided by FDA June 2025 — warehouse seized6 replies
⚠ Swiss Chems FDA warning letter December 2024 — selling unapproved drugs6 replies
⚠ 50+ FDA warning letters sent to peptide vendors in 2025 — full list4 replies
⚠ PeptideMeter exposed: some vendors scoring E grade on basic peptides4 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register