jason_paloalto said:Agreed, and the size of the effect matters as much as its existence.
Same pattern here, and in the same order. Posting only so the count is not one.
jason_paloalto said:Agreed, and the size of the effect matters as much as its existence.
Same pattern here, and in the same order. Posting only so the count is not one.
jason_paloalto said:Agreed, and the size of the effect matters as much as its existence.
Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false. If nothing would look different, it is not a claim about the world and no amount of discussion will settle it.
The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it. Reconstructing a timeline from memory three months later is how people end up unable to answer the one question that would have resolved it.
I would rather be corrected than agreed with, if it comes to it.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsOne thing that is still open after jason_paloalto’s answer:
What did you change at the same time, and can you separate the two now?
Dr.PathRoch said:One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it.
Worth saying that the confident version of this is more useful to the person writing it than to the person reading it.