One thing that is still open after DeniseRN_TPA’s answer:
How would you tell the difference between that and the alternative explanation?
One thing that is still open after DeniseRN_TPA’s answer:
How would you tell the difference between that and the alternative explanation?
Dr.NateNeph said:If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself.
This is where I part company with the consensus forming above. This treats a plausible mechanism as a demonstrated one. Plausible is where you start looking, not where you stop.
Dr.NateNeph said:If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself.
Fair, and it stops being fair at the extremes. The middle of the range is well understood; the ends are where the honest answer is that nobody knows.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsDr.NateNeph said:If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself.
Thank you for spelling out the reasoning rather than just the conclusion. Adding it to my notes with a link back to this thread.
Closing the loop on my own question.
Resolved, and the thing that resolved it was the least interesting suggestion in the thread. Writing that down for the next person who wants the interesting answer.