Is it possible to reverse type 2 or am I dreaming — 12 month update

tane_welly said:

HbA1c reflects roughly three months of average glycaemia weighted toward the most recent weeks, which is why repeating it at six weeks tells you very…

My labs after 9 months on glycaemic control: A1C 5.0%, fasting glucose 85 mg/dL, fasting insulin 4 uIU/mL. My endo says these are "textbook perfect."

For context, my baseline A1C was 6.5% and fasting glucose was 110 mg/dL. The improvement has been dramatic and consistent.

One thing that is still open after Dr.DermMIA’s answer:

Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?

dan_philly said:

My labs after 9 months on glycaemic control: A1C 5.0%, fasting glucose 85 mg/dL, fasting insulin 4 uIU/mL.

Insulin sensitivity test (HOMA-IR) on glycaemic control — arguably the most important metabolic marker most people aren't tracking:

HOMA-IR = (fasting insulin × fasting glucose) ÷ 405

My numbers: Baseline HOMA-IR = 5.4 (insulin resistant) → Current = 1.4 (insulin sensitive)

Anything above 2.0 indicates insulin resistance. The goal is below 1.5. GLP-1 agonists address the root metabolic dysfunction, not just the symptoms. This is why they work so much better than calorie restriction alone.

dan_philly said:

My labs after 9 months on glycaemic control: A1C 5.0%, fasting glucose 85 mg/dL, fasting insulin 4 uIU/mL.

Complete metabolic panel trending on glycaemic control — sharing because comprehensive data helps everyone:

The insulin resistance improvement (HOMA-IR) is what my endo focuses on most. Going from 4.5 to near 1.0 is a metabolic transformation.

NurseKim_ATL said:

Insulin sensitivity test (HOMA-IR) on glycaemic control — arguably the most important metabolic marker most people aren't tracking: HOMA-IR = (fasting…

Glycemic variability as the key metric for glycaemic control success: my coefficient of variation (CV) on CGM dropped from 36% to 22%. Target is <36%, with <30% being ideal.

Why this matters more than average glucose: large glucose swings cause oxidative stress, endothelial damage, and promote advanced glycation end-products (AGEs). A flat glucose line at 95 mg/dL is metabolically healthier than oscillating between 60 and 160, even if the average is the same.