Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked. Narrow it and it becomes tractable; leave it broad and the thread will produce nine confident and incompatible replies.
Dr.NateNeph said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
This matches mine closely enough to be worth saying so out loud.
Dr.NateNeph said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
Coming at Dr.NateNeph’s question from a different direction. The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person. Both are real; they answer different questions and get quoted as if they were the same one.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsThe figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here. A large fraction of the apparent disagreement in these threads is two people using different units and both being right.
One thing that is still open after Dr.NateNeph’s answer:
What did you change at the same time, and can you separate the two now?