pete_RVA said:True, and it depends on a baseline nobody has stated.
Same pattern here, and in the same order. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.
pete_RVA said:True, and it depends on a baseline nobody has stated.
Coming at pete_RVA’s question from a different direction. It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any. If nothing would, the discussion is not about evidence, and it is better to say so early than to spend nine posts discovering it.
Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it. Reconstructing a timeline from memory three months later is how people end up unable to answer the one question that would have resolved it.
I would rather be corrected than agreed with, if it comes to it.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsOne thing that is still open after pete_RVA’s answer:
How long did you give it before you decided it was working?
BiostatsBrad said:One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it.
I read this differently from BiostatsBrad, on substance rather than tone. The counter-case has not been addressed. Somebody upthread described the situation that does not fit, and the thread moved on rather than engaging with it, which is the failure mode this board is supposed to avoid.
I would rather be corrected than agreed with, if it comes to it.