🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsBuyer Beware⚠ Peptide Sciences SHUT DOWN March 6, 2026 — November 2025 Page 3

⚠ Peptide Sciences SHUT DOWN March 6, 2026 — November 2025

maya_sedona Sat, Apr 26, 2025 at 4:37 PM 27 replies 1,728 viewsPage 3 of 6
DataDave
Senior Member
1,678
8,901
Apr 2024
Washington
Online
Apr 29, 2025 at 11:23 AM#11
Dr.EM_Chicago said:
There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.

No disagreement, though the timescale matters more than the mechanism here. Most of what looks like a difference in kind turns out to be a difference in how long somebody waited.

Last edited: Apr 29, 2025 at 12:23 PM
15 13VendorMark, COA_Karl, MikeFit_NJ and 12 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
maria_elpaso
Member
312
1,456
Sep 2024
El Paso, TX
Apr 29, 2025 at 4:36 PM#12
Dr.GastroMayo said:
Right, and one flattering data point from a group buy is not consistency.

Thank you for spelling out the reasoning rather than just the conclusion.

16 14RunnerRach, TrialNerd_Beth, HPLC_Greg and 13 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
ingrid_STO
Member
345
1,456
Jul 2024
Stockholm, SE
Apr 29, 2025 at 9:50 PM#13
Dr.EM_Chicago said:
There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.

I am going to disagree with the direction of travel here. The thread has converged on the tidiest answer rather than the best-supported one, and those are not the same thing.

Last edited: Apr 30, 2025 at 12:50 AM
17 15MikeFit_NJ, InsuranceTom, WendyG_ATL and 14 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Janoshik Analytical — Independent Testing

Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.

Verify Your Peptides

GL Biochem (Shanghai) Ltd. — Direct Manufacturer

Est. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.

Browse GL Biochem
VendorMark
Senior Member
3,456
14,567
Jan 2024
Texas
Online
Apr 30, 2025 at 3:04 AM#14

One concrete data point for the thread. One habit that pays for itself: post the method alongside the number. A figure without its method cannot be checked, and an unchecked figure is how this community accumulates folklore.

18 16Dr.PeteFamMed, claudia_zurich, nancy_portland and 15 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Admin
Administrator
2,456
9,812
Oct 2023
Online
Apr 30, 2025 at 8:18 AM#15

Moderator note: reminder that nothing in this thread is medical advice, and that clinical claims need a source. Carry on.

19 17PeptideSynthNJ, Dr.KarenChen, Dr.NateNeph and 16 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

⚠ Peptide Sciences SHUT DOWN March 6, 2026 — what happened and what to do now8 replies
⚠ Amino Asylum raided by FDA June 2025 — warehouse seized6 replies
⚠ Swiss Chems FDA warning letter December 2024 — selling unapproved drugs6 replies
⚠ 50+ FDA warning letters sent to peptide vendors in 2025 — full list4 replies
⚠ PeptideMeter exposed: some vendors scoring E grade on basic peptides4 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register