FDA_TrackerJim said:One habit that pays for itself: post the method alongside the number.
This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else. Printing the relevant bit and taking it with me.
From the other side of the consultation, briefly. It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false. If nothing would look different, it is not a claim about the world and no amount of discussion will settle it.
lisa_labSD said:It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.
Same pattern here, and in the same order.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference Standardslisa_labSD said:It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.
Coming at lisa_labSD’s question from a different direction. Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion. Almost every disagreement here turns out to be two people measuring different things and comparing the numbers anyway.
One concrete data point for the thread. Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason. In three months the reason is what you will have forgotten, and the reason is what makes the record worth having.