tyler_CSCS said:Resolved, and the thing that resolved it was the least interesting suggestion in the thread.
This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.
tyler_CSCS said:Resolved, and the thing that resolved it was the least interesting suggestion in the thread.
This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.
tyler_CSCS said:Resolved, and the thing that resolved it was the least interesting suggestion in the thread.
Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions. Agreeing that something happens says nothing about whether it happens enough to act on.
Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. The boring version of this is the one that works, and the boring version is: measure a baseline, change one variable, wait, measure again under the same conditions. Nobody wants that answer and it is still the answer.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemOne thing that is still open after tyler_CSCS’s answer:
Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?
VendorMark said:The boring version of this is the one that works, and the boring version is: measure a baseline, change one variable, wait, measure again under the…
I am going to disagree with the direction of travel here. The thread has converged on the tidiest answer rather than the best-supported one, and those are not the same thing.
That is the short version; the long version is somebody else's post.