sean_dublin said:Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it.
Agreed, and one caution: a single measurement is not a measurement. Anything that moves day to day needs a trend before it means anything at all.
That is the short version; the long version is somebody else's post.
JakeBK_lifts said:Agreed, with a caveat about community reputation: it is a lagging indicator.
This answered a question I did not know how to ask.
sean_dublin said:Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it.
I read this differently from sean_dublin, on substance rather than tone. This treats a plausible mechanism as a demonstrated one. Plausible is where you start looking, not where you stop.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsThe figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. Give anything pharmacological four weeks before you judge it, and give anything measured weekly a four-point rolling average before you call it a trend.
Moderator note: reminder that nothing in this thread is medical advice, and that clinical claims need a source. No action needed from anybody.