roxy_nash said:It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.
Right, and the exception is worth naming rather than left implied, because the exception is where people get into trouble.
roxy_nash said:It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.
Right, and the exception is worth naming rather than left implied, because the exception is where people get into trouble.
DanielChem_CHI said:Agreed, with a caveat about community reputation: it is a lagging indicator.
Thank you for spelling out the reasoning rather than just the conclusion. Sending this to two other people who asked me the same thing last week.
roxy_nash said:It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.
Worth saying that the confident version of this is more useful to the person writing it than to the person reading it.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsAdding the numbers, since they settle part of this. Give anything pharmacological four weeks before you judge it, and give anything measured weekly a four-point rolling average before you call it a trend.