TrialNerd_Beth said:Agreed, and one caution: a single measurement is not a measurement.
Same pattern here, and in the same order. The detail I would add is minor and it is already implied above.
TrialNerd_Beth said:Agreed, and one caution: a single measurement is not a measurement.
Same pattern here, and in the same order. The detail I would add is minor and it is already implied above.
TrialNerd_Beth said:Agreed, and one caution: a single measurement is not a measurement.
There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person. Both are real; they answer different questions and get quoted as if they were the same one.
The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason. In three months the reason is what you will have forgotten, and the reason is what makes the record worth having.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsFollowing on from TrialNerd_Beth — and this may be the naive question:
What would you measure differently if you were starting again?
jason_paloalto said:Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason.
I am going to disagree with the direction of travel here. The thread has converged on the tidiest answer rather than the best-supported one, and those are not the same thing.