🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsBuyer BewareHas anyone dealt with ⚠ telegram scammers impersonating wwb and qsc? Page 5

Has anyone dealt with ⚠ telegram scammers impersonating wwb and qsc?

FitDadDave Sun, Mar 15, 2026 at 2:06 AM 32 replies 1,448 viewsPage 5 of 7
SandraNC_45
Member
312
1,345
Sep 2024
Charlotte, NC
Mar 26, 2026 at 1:24 PM#21
TrialNerd_Beth said:
Agreed, and one caution: a single measurement is not a measurement.

Same pattern here, and in the same order. The detail I would add is minor and it is already implied above.

Last edited: Mar 26, 2026 at 6:24 PM
24 22FranDenver, Dr.BariatricHTX, LindaRN_retired and 21 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
DoseLogDan
Member
201
567
Feb 2025
Montana
Mar 29, 2026 at 1:50 PM#22
TrialNerd_Beth said:
Agreed, and one caution: a single measurement is not a measurement.

There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person. Both are real; they answer different questions and get quoted as if they were the same one.

25 23Dr.AddMedPHL, newstart_MO, mia_MS2 and 22 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
jason_paloalto
Member
212
890
Nov 2024
Palo Alto, CA
Apr 1, 2026 at 2:14 PM#23

The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason. In three months the reason is what you will have forgotten, and the reason is what makes the record worth having.

26 24mona_PHX, andrew_nyc, Dr.EndoEP and 23 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics

Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.

View Results
TirzTom
Senior Member
2,789
9,876
Feb 2024
Florida
Online
Apr 4, 2026 at 2:36 PM#24

Following on from TrialNerd_Beth — and this may be the naive question:

What would you measure differently if you were starting again?

Last edited: Apr 4, 2026 at 6:36 PM
27 0SandraNC_45, Dr.EndoIndy, tom_AK and 24 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.MetabolicMD
VIP Member
2,345
16,789
Jan 2024
Rochester, MN
Apr 7, 2026 at 2:57 PM#25
jason_paloalto said:
Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason.

I am going to disagree with the direction of travel here. The thread has converged on the tidiest answer rather than the best-supported one, and those are not the same thing.

28 1GenomicsKate, Dr.ObesityMed, HealthEcon_DC and 25 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

⚠ Peptide Sciences SHUT DOWN March 6, 2026 — what happened and what to do now8 replies
⚠ Amino Asylum raided by FDA June 2025 — warehouse seized6 replies
⚠ Swiss Chems FDA warning letter December 2024 — selling unapproved drugs6 replies
⚠ 50+ FDA warning letters sent to peptide vendors in 2025 — full list4 replies
⚠ PeptideMeter exposed: some vendors scoring E grade on basic peptides4 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register