Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person. Both are real; they answer different questions and get quoted as if they were the same one.
Following on from EndoResFellow — and this may be the naive question:
Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?
pat_auckland said:The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person.
I am going to disagree with the direction of travel here. The thread has converged on the tidiest answer rather than the best-supported one, and those are not the same thing.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference Standardspat_auckland said:The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person.
That is right for the common case. Whether it is right for the case being asked about depends on a detail that has not been given.
I would rather be corrected than agreed with, if it comes to it.
Moderator note: a post naming a supplier has been edited. Discuss suppliers in the review sections, not here. Thread quality here is what the rules are for. Keep it up.