fiona_VT said:Agreed, and the size of the effect matters as much as its existence.
Can confirm. Same sequence, different timescale. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.
fiona_VT said:Agreed, and the size of the effect matters as much as its existence.
Coming at fiona_VT’s question from a different direction. The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions. Agreeing that something happens says nothing about whether it happens enough to act on.
The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath. An edited-away mistake is invisible to the next person who makes it.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsA narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:
How long did you give it before you decided it was working?
PeptideChemSF said:Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.
Careful with the causal language. Two things moving together in a period when five things changed is not a mechanism, and stating it as one makes the thread less useful to somebody reading it later.
Ask again with the specifics and you will get a better answer than this one.