Blacklisted vendor compilation — updated June 2026

PharmHunterJen said:

The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person.

Mine went the same way, slower.

PharmHunterJen said:

The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person.

There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it. The narrow version usually has an answer; the broad version usually does not, and answering the broad one is how a thread stops being useful.

Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself. Four weeks is the usual minimum for anything pharmacological on this board, and two weeks of data has told you almost nothing.

Happy to go further on any of that.

A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:

What would you measure differently if you were starting again?

lucas_SP_BR said:

If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself.

Pushing back on lucas_SP_BR here. I think the framing smuggles in the conclusion. Ask it the other way round and the obvious answer reverses, which usually means the question is doing the work.