🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsDosing & ProtocolsTirzepatide titration: 2.5→5→7.5→10→12.5→15mg guide Page 15

Tirzepatide titration: 2.5→5→7.5→10→12.5→15mg guide

Dr.Martinez Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 5:20 PM 181 replies 34,127 viewsPage 15 of 20
tyler_CSCS
Member
567
2,567
Jun 2024
Phoenix, AZ
Jun 13, 2024 at 9:36 PM#71
labquiet_amy said:
If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself.

I read this differently from labquiet_amy, on substance rather than tone. Filing an objection on the n=1 problem. Personal experience is genuine evidence about one person and very weak evidence about anybody else, and this thread keeps promoting the first into the second.

Last edited: Jun 13, 2024 at 11:36 PM
3 3sean_dublin, hannah_MT, Dr.SportsMedIN
Reply Quote Save Share Report
PharmHunterJen
Member
567
2,345
Jul 2024
Illinois
Jun 15, 2024 at 11:00 PM#72
labquiet_amy said:
If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself.

Agreed, and one caution: a single measurement is not a measurement. Anything that moves day to day needs a trend before it means anything at all.

2 2alex_tucson, kevin_tulsa
Reply Quote Save Share Report
bri_stats
Member
789
3,456
May 2024
Seattle, WA
Jun 18, 2024 at 12:22 AM#73
labquiet_amy said:
If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself.

Thank you — that is the clearest version of this I have read, and I have read a lot of them.

1 1TomFromTexas
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
Dr.PathRoch
Member
456
2,123
Jun 2024
Rochester, MN
Jun 20, 2024 at 1:43 AM#74

From the other side of the consultation, briefly. There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.

If somebody has the primary source to hand I would rather cite it than paraphrase it.

Last edited: Jun 20, 2024 at 7:43 AM
50 0SaraMom3, Dr.MetabolicMD, RetaRick_CA and 47 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
greg_boulder
Member
345
1,567
Jul 2024
Boulder, CO
Jun 22, 2024 at 3:03 AM#75
Dr.PathRoch said:
There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.

Adding a me-too, because a thread of one person's experience is not much use. Posting only so the count is not one.

Last edited: Jun 22, 2024 at 5:03 AM
49 24ben_calgary, patPC_UT, Dr.DermMIA and 46 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

Micro-dosing semaglutide — is sub-therapeutic dosing effective?16 replies
Injection technique: subcutaneous depot formation and absorption8 replies
Semaglutide PK modeling — when to time your injection12 replies
Reconstitution calculator — compounded peptide dosing math7 replies
Half-life implications for missed doses — PK-based guidance5 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register