Dr.PainCLE said:Reporting back with a partial result, because a partial result is still better than silence.
This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth.
Dr.PainCLE said:Reporting back with a partial result, because a partial result is still better than silence.
Worth restating a point from upthread for anyone joining at this page:
Whatever the answer turns out to be, the method for getting there is the same: state the assumption, do the arithmetic in public, and invite the correction. That is slower than asserting, and it is the only version that survives being wrong.
Worth restating a point from upthread for anyone joining at this page:
Filing an objection on the n=1 problem. Personal experience is genuine evidence about one person and very weak evidence about anybody else, and this thread keeps promoting the first into the second.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemOne thing that is still open after Dr.PainCLE’s answer:
Did your prescriber agree with that reading, and if not what was their objection?
TomFromTexas said:Personal experience is genuine evidence about one person and very weak evidence about anybody else, and this thread keeps promoting the first into the…
I am going to disagree with the direction of travel here. The thread has converged on the tidiest answer rather than the best-supported one, and those are not the same thing.