rachel_ABQ said:If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not.
No disagreement with rachel_ABQ. One condition attached. Yes, and the corollary is less popular: if the reasoning holds, it also holds where it produces an answer we do not like.
Dr.ObesityMed said:Agreed, with a caveat about community reputation: it is a lagging indicator.
This answered a question I did not know how to ask. Taking it to my next appointment.
rachel_ABQ said:If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not.
This is where I part company with the consensus forming above. The objection nobody has made: this only works if the measurement is doing what we assume it is doing, and that assumption has not been tested here.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsOne concrete data point for the thread. Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look. It is a small discipline and it changes what you notice.
That is the short version; the long version is somebody else's post.
Moderator note: the sourcing question belongs in the vendor section and has been split out. Report rather than reply if it drifts again.