🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsVendor Reviews[REVIEW] GL Biochem — 6 month update Page 3

[REVIEW] GL Biochem — 6 month update

NauseaFreeNow Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 5:40 PM 12 replies 1,541 viewsPage 3 of 3
VendorMark
Senior Member
3,456
14,567
Jan 2024
Texas
Online
Mar 9, 2025 at 1:32 AM#11
hans_munich said:
There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.

Agreed on the substance. I would put less weight on the timescale, because two months of anything is not enough to distinguish a trend from a wobble.

Last edited: Mar 9, 2025 at 3:32 AM
3 1DebRD_ATL, KristenIndy, MarkLI_maint
Reply Quote Save Share Report
SurmountFan_IN
Member
789
3,456
May 2024
Indianapolis, IN
Mar 11, 2025 at 10:41 PM#12
ingrid_STO said:
Right, and one flattering data point from a group buy is not consistency.

This answered a question I did not know how to ask.

Last edited: Mar 11, 2025 at 11:41 PM
4 2AttorneyGrant, DebRD_ATL, KristenIndy and 1 other
Reply Quote Save Share Report
adam_van
Member
212
890
Nov 2024
Vancouver, CA
Mar 14, 2025 at 7:48 PM#13
hans_munich said:
There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.

Filing a mild objection. Mild because I might be wrong; an objection because nobody has addressed the case that does not fit. Filing an objection on the n=1 problem. Personal experience is genuine evidence about one person and very weak evidence about anybody else, and this thread keeps promoting the first into the second.

5 3LindaRN_retired, tommy_boulder, hyun_seoul and 2 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
hank_denver
Member
278
1,234
Sep 2024
Denver, CO
Mar 17, 2025 at 4:54 PM#14

One concrete data point for the thread. Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath. An edited-away mistake is invisible to the next person who makes it.

Last edited: Mar 17, 2025 at 8:54 PM
6 4fiona_VT, denise_HTX, raj_cambridge and 3 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Admin
Administrator
2,456
9,812
Oct 2023
Online
Mar 20, 2025 at 1:58 PM#15

Moderator note: the sourcing question belongs in the vendor section and has been split out.

7 5PeptideSynthNJ, Dr.KarenChen, Dr.NateNeph and 4 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

[REVIEW] WWB — 8 months, 6 orders, all Janoshik tested7 replies
[REVIEW] QSC — consistency and pricing, 10+ orders deep5 replies
[REVIEW] GGPeps — 6 orders, all independently tested3 replies
Which vendor should I go with? Side-by-side comparison3 replies
How do you vet a new vendor? My quality checklist9 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register