🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsNutrition & SupplementationProtein powder rankings — anyone have experience? Page 2

Protein powder rankings — anyone have experience?

tane_welly Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 5:01 PM 11 replies 1,904 viewsPage 2 of 3
TirzTom
Senior Member
2,789
9,876
Feb 2024
Florida
Online
Jun 26, 2024 at 9:31 PM#6
tane_welly said:
On a suppressed appetite the winning strategy is protein density per unit of volume, not per calorie.

DEXA scan update relevant to protein intake:

Scanned at months 0, 6, and 12. Here are the body comp numbers:

BaselineMonth 6Month 12
Total mass283 lbs228 lbs210 lbs
Fat mass113 lbs83 lbs45 lbs
Lean mass151 lbs150 lbs157 lbs
Body fat %44%30%24%

Lean mass preserved — actually GAINED 1-2 lbs thanks to progressive overload + 1.4g/kg protein. The protein intake discussion needs to include body comp data, not just scale weight.

50 20josh_phd_bmore, roxy_nash, tony_orlando and 47 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
steve_okc
Member
489
2,123
Jul 2024
Oklahoma City, OK
Jun 26, 2024 at 11:17 PM#7

Following on from Dr.EM_Chicago — and this may be the naive question:

How people are hitting a protein target on a genuinely suppressed appetite, because volume is the binding constraint rather than willingness?

49 19JakeSmashed95, NauseaFreeNow, SteveThurs and 46 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.CardioMD
VIP Member
2,678
14,567
Dec 2023
Cleveland, OH
Jun 27, 2024 at 1:03 AM#8
TirzTom said:
DEXA scan update relevant to protein intake: Scanned at months 0, 6, and 12.

Coming at TirzTom’s question from a different direction. Whatever the answer turns out to be, the method for getting there is the same: state the assumption, do the arithmetic in public, and invite the correction. That is slower than asserting, and it is the only version that survives being wrong.

48 18tony_orlando, Dr.NephBHM_UK, kim_atl_prep and 45 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Janoshik Analytical — Independent Testing

Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.

Verify Your Peptides

GL Biochem (Shanghai) Ltd. — Direct Manufacturer

Est. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.

Browse GL Biochem
tane_welly
Member
234
1,123
Sep 2024
Wellington, NZ
Jun 27, 2024 at 2:49 AM#9

Closing the loop on my own question.

Reporting back — setting the target on reference weight rather than current weight turned an impossible number into a boring one.

47 17marco_milano, pam_columbus, nick_SD_fit and 44 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
MounjBrad
Member
278
890
Oct 2024
Kentucky
Jun 27, 2024 at 11:16 AM#10
Dr.CardioMD said:
Whatever the answer turns out to be, the method for getting there is the same: state the assumption, do the arithmetic in public, and invite the…

True, and anyone with reduced kidney function needs that target set by a clinician rather than a forum. High protein is safe in normal kidneys and is not automatically safe in impaired ones.

Last edited: Jun 27, 2024 at 4:16 PM
23 21marco_milano, pam_columbus, nick_SD_fit and 20 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

Protein requirements on GLP-1: systematic review of RDA vs optimal intake8 replies
Micronutrient deficiency risk on GLP-1 — B12, D, iron, zinc, folate10 replies
High-protein meal plans for GLP-1 users — 1500-2000 kcal options9 replies
Meal prep Sunday — weekly high-protein recipes thread9 replies
Creatine monohydrate + GLP-1 — safety and lean mass preservation data14 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register