🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsVendor Reviews[REVIEW] QSC — July 2024 Page 3

[REVIEW] QSC — July 2024

Dr.EndoIndy Fri, May 16, 2025 at 3:40 PM 11 replies 1,426 viewsPage 3 of 3
Dr.ObesityMed
VIP Member
3,456
19,234
Nov 2023
Denver, CO
Online
May 18, 2025 at 9:09 AM#11
LipidDoc_ATL said:
There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.

That is right for the common case. Whether it is right for the case being asked about depends on a detail that has not been given.

Happy to go further on any of that.

3 1EndoResFellow, PharmacoVig_BOS, SurmountFan_IN
Reply Quote Save Share Report
paige_pharma
Member
289
1,234
Sep 2024
Omaha, NE
May 18, 2025 at 12:24 PM#12
anna.melb_AU said:
Agreed, with a caveat about community reputation: it is a lagging indicator.

Saving this. It is the first explanation that did not require me to already understand it. Printing the relevant bit and taking it with me.

4 2Dr.SurgeonPGH, rachel_ABQ, traveltech_sara and 1 other
Reply Quote Save Share Report
tampaLisa73
Member
312
1,456
Oct 2024
Tampa, FL
May 18, 2025 at 3:39 PM#13
LipidDoc_ATL said:
There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.

Worth saying that the confident version of this is more useful to the person writing it than to the person reading it.

Correct me if the detail matters more than I have assumed.

5 3sarah_nash92, FitDadDave, RunnerRach and 2 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
Dr.PeteFamMed
Senior Member
2,012
9,234
Jan 2024
Minneapolis, MN
May 18, 2025 at 6:54 PM#14

The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way. Most of the apparent contradictions in these threads dissolve at that step.

6 4Dr.BariatricHTX, LindaRN_retired, tommy_boulder and 3 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
mike_mod
Moderator
7,234
19,823
Nov 2023
New York
Online
May 18, 2025 at 10:09 PM#15

Moderator note: a post naming a supplier has been edited. Discuss suppliers in the review sections, not here. Report rather than reply if it drifts again.

Last edited: May 19, 2025 at 12:09 AM
7 5PurityPaulOR, MaxMetOK, MounjBrad and 4 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

[REVIEW] WWB — 8 months, 6 orders, all Janoshik tested7 replies
[REVIEW] QSC — consistency and pricing, 10+ orders deep5 replies
[REVIEW] GGPeps — 6 orders, all independently tested3 replies
Which vendor should I go with? Side-by-side comparison3 replies
How do you vet a new vendor? My quality checklist9 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register