Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion. Almost every disagreement here turns out to be two people measuring different things and comparing the numbers anyway.
LindaRN_retired said:Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion.
Mine went the same way, slower. Nothing to add that would improve it.
LindaRN_retired said:Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion.
Coming at LindaRN_retired’s question from a different direction. There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemOne concrete data point for the thread. Give anything pharmacological four weeks before you judge it, and give anything measured weekly a four-point rolling average before you call it a trend.
Following on from LindaRN_retired — and this may be the naive question:
How people are distinguishing a supplier having a bad batch from a supplier on the way out?