Dr.PathRoch said:Order of operations matters more than any single choice here: establish a baseline, change one thing, wait long enough for it to express itself, then…
Genuinely useful, thank you. I had the facts and not the framework.
This was answered several pages up and is worth repeating rather than re-litigating:
Agreed, and the size of the effect matters as much as its existence. Something real and small gets treated here as though it were real and decisive.
LipidDoc_ATL said:Agreed, and the size of the effect matters as much as its existence.
Same experience, arrived at from the opposite direction.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemLipidDoc_ATL said:Agreed, and the size of the effect matters as much as its existence.
Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. Most of what circulates confidently in this community traces back to one summary of one study, and the qualifier was dropped somewhere in the third retelling.
Coming back to something from earlier in the thread, because it keeps being talked past:
The honest answer is that the effect is real, the magnitude is contested, and the individual variation is larger than either. Those three things can all be true at once, and most arguments here are two people holding different parts of that.