🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsRetatrutide & Triple AgonistsTriple agonist sounds scary - is it actually safe

Triple agonist sounds scary - is it actually safe

nick_newbie Thu, Apr 23, 2026 at 6:55 PM 3 replies 480 viewsPage 1 of 1
nick_newbie
New Member
18
56
Jun 2026
Virginia
Online
Apr 23, 2026 at 6:55 PM#1

Reading the retatrutide phase 2 data properly rather than the headline, and the 24% figure is doing a lot of work that the confidence interval does not support as firmly as people think.

The bit I cannot resolve on my own is what the phase 2 dropout pattern implies about how the phase 3 tolerability will read.

I would rather have one careful answer than five confident ones.

22 17robert_kc, dan_philly, MeganSA_TX and 19 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
LipidDoc_ATL
Senior Member
1,123
5,678
Apr 2024
Atlanta, GA
Apr 23, 2026 at 7:21 PM#2

Answering the narrow version, because the broad one does not have a single answer. Order of operations matters more than any single choice here: establish a baseline, change one thing, wait long enough for it to express itself, then measure again under the same conditions.

If somebody has the primary source to hand I would rather cite it than paraphrase it.

21 16traveltech_sara, AttorneyGrant, DebRD_ATL and 18 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
maya_sedona
Member
289
1,234
Sep 2024
Sedona, AZ
Apr 23, 2026 at 7:47 PM#3
LipidDoc_ATL said:
Order of operations matters more than any single choice here: establish a baseline, change one thing, wait long enough for it to express itself, then…

LipidDoc_ATL has the substance of this right. The condition it depends on is worth stating. The phase 2 numbers were about 24% mean weight loss at 48 weeks on the top dose, with the curve still descending at the end of the study. A curve that has not flattened is a real finding, but it also means the true plateau is unknown, and phase 2 populations are small and selected.

Last edited: Apr 23, 2026 at 11:47 PM
20 15BenResearch_OR, MikeKY_noInsulin, Dr.RaviCardio and 17 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Janoshik Analytical — Independent Testing

Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.

Verify Your Peptides

GL Biochem (Shanghai) Ltd. — Direct Manufacturer

Est. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.

Browse GL Biochem
tony_orlando
Member
234
1,123
Nov 2024
Orlando, FL
Apr 23, 2026 at 8:14 PM#4
nick_newbie said:
Reading the retatrutide phase 2 data properly rather than the headline, and the 24% figure is doing a lot of work that the confidence interval does…

Same experience, arrived at from the opposite direction.

Last edited: Apr 23, 2026 at 9:14 PM
19 14CanadaChris, ZaraB_AL, JakeSmashed95 and 16 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
PharmacoVig_BOS
Senior Member
1,567
8,901
Feb 2024
Boston, MA
Apr 23, 2026 at 10:39 PM#5

Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. The mechanism and the magnitude are separate questions. Agreeing that something happens says nothing about whether it happens enough to act on.

Last edited: Apr 24, 2026 at 1:39 AM
18 13LabKate, kate.chem, DataDave and 15 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

TRIUMPH-3 topline results — 24.2% body weight loss at 48 weeks10 replies
Retatrutide mechanism: GLP-1/GIP/glucagon triple agonism explained5 replies
Retatrutide Phase 2 dose-response analysis — optimal dose range10 replies
Glucagon receptor agonism and hepatic lipid oxidation — MASH implications13 replies
Retatrutide vs tirzepatide — dual vs triple agonist comparison22 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register